AI Prompt
I am building a bacteria detecting model using pretrained yolo model with oriented bounding box (OBB). Here, I am facing a problem with the images where images contain bacteria with varying brightness. Some bacteria are much brighter than some others, and some end up with brightness close to the background. When labeling, we used sliders to only show pixels within certain boundaries to display low signaling bacteria. Is there any image processing technique that could somehow brighten all the bacteria?
AI Response
This is a common challenge in microscopy image processing, and there are several techniques we can use to enhance the visibility of bacteria with varying brightness levels. Here are some approaches we could try:
- Adaptive Histogram Equalization (specifically CLAHE - Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization):
- Works locally on different regions of the image
- Better at handling varying brightness levels than standard histogram equalization
- Preserves local details while enhancing contrast
- Local contrast enhancement:
- Applying contrast enhancement in smaller windows
- Can help bring out dimmer bacteria without over-saturating bright ones
- Multi-scale enhancement:
- Decomposing the image into different frequency bands
- Enhancing each band separately
- Recombining the enhanced bands
Would you like me to show you how to implement any of these approaches? We could start with CLAHE as it’s often very effective for microscopy images. Would that be helpful?
The nice thing about these methods is that they can be applied as a preprocessing step before feeding the images to your YOLO model.
AI Prompt
okay, let’s start with CLAHE
AI Response
I’ll help you implement CLAHE using OpenCV. First, let’s write a basic implementation and then we can adjust parameters as needed.
import cv2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def apply_clahe(image, clip_limit=2.0, tile_grid_size=(8,8)):
# Convert to uint8 if not already
if image.dtype != np.uint8:
= cv2.normalize(image, None, 0, 255, cv2.NORM_MINMAX).astype(np.uint8)
image
# Create CLAHE object
= cv2.createCLAHE(clipLimit=clip_limit, tileGridSize=tile_grid_size)
clahe
# Apply CLAHE
= clahe.apply(image)
enhanced
return enhanced
# Function to display original and enhanced images side by side
def display_comparison(original, enhanced):
=(12,6))
plt.figure(figsize121)
plt.subplot(='gray')
plt.imshow(original, cmap'Original Image')
plt.title('off')
plt.axis(
122)
plt.subplot(='gray')
plt.imshow(enhanced, cmap'CLAHE Enhanced')
plt.title('off')
plt.axis(
plt.show()
Could you share a sample image so we can test this and adjust the parameters? The key parameters we can tune are:
clip_limit
: Controls contrast enhancement (higher values = more enhancement but might increase noise)tile_grid_size
: Size of grid for local histogram equalization (smaller grid = more local enhancement)
If you don’t want to share an image, you can try this code with your images and let me know how it works. We can then adjust the parameters based on your results.
Would you like to try this first, or would you prefer me to explain more about how CLAHE works?
AI Prompt
how does CLAHE work?
AI Response
Let me explain how CLAHE (Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization) works:
- Basic Principle:
- Unlike regular histogram equalization which works on the entire image at once, CLAHE works on small regions (tiles) of the image
- This local approach helps maintain local details and contrast
- Step-by-Step Process:
- The image is divided into small tiles (defined by tile_grid_size)
- For each tile:
- A local histogram is computed
- The histogram is clipped at a predetermined value (clip_limit) to prevent noise amplification
- Histogram equalization is applied to that tile
- Bilinear interpolation is used to eliminate artificial boundaries between tiles
- Key Advantages:
- Better handling of local contrast
- Prevents over-amplification of noise (through clipping)
- Preserves edges and local details
- Works well with varying brightness levels in different image regions
- Parameters Impact:
- clip_limit: Higher values allow more contrast enhancement but may increase noise
- tile_grid_size: Smaller tiles give more local enhancement but might make the image look “patchy”
Would you like to try the implementation now with your images? We can start with the default parameters (clip_limit=2.0, tile_grid_size=(8,8)) and adjust them based on your specific needs.
AI Prompt
I think increasing clip_limit to 10 is good
AI Response
Let’s modify the code to use a higher clip_limit of 10. This will allow for stronger contrast enhancement, which might help make dimmer bacteria more visible. Here’s the updated code:
def apply_clahe(image, clip_limit=10.0, tile_grid_size=(8,8)):
# Convert to uint8 if not already
if image.dtype != np.uint8:
= cv2.normalize(image, None, 0, 255, cv2.NORM_MINMAX).astype(np.uint8)
image
# Create CLAHE object with higher clip limit
= cv2.createCLAHE(clipLimit=clip_limit, tileGridSize=tile_grid_size)
clahe
# Apply CLAHE
= clahe.apply(image)
enhanced
return enhanced
Try this with your images and let me know if: 1. The bacteria visibility has improved 2. The noise level is acceptable 3. You’d like to adjust the tile_grid_size as well
If you need any further adjustments or want to try another approach, just let me know!
AI Prompt
I think the bright ones are too bright. Is there any way to reduce the brightness of the brithest ones?
AI Response
Yes, we can handle this by adding intensity capping or compression for the brightest pixels. Here’s a modified version that includes gamma correction and optional intensity capping:
def enhance_bacteria(image, clip_limit=10.0, tile_grid_size=(8,8), gamma=1.2, max_percentile=99):
# Convert to uint8 if not already
if image.dtype != np.uint8:
= cv2.normalize(image, None, 0, 255, cv2.NORM_MINMAX).astype(np.uint8)
image
# Cap very bright intensities using percentile
= np.percentile(image, max_percentile)
threshold = np.minimum(image, threshold)
image
# Renormalize to full range
= cv2.normalize(image, None, 0, 255, cv2.NORM_MINMAX).astype(np.uint8)
image
# Apply gamma correction to compress high intensities
= np.power(image / 255.0, gamma) * 255.0
image = image.astype(np.uint8)
image
# Apply CLAHE
= cv2.createCLAHE(clipLimit=clip_limit, tileGridSize=tile_grid_size)
clahe = clahe.apply(image)
enhanced
return enhanced
This version: 1. Caps very bright pixels at the 99th percentile (adjustable via max_percentile) 2. Applies gamma correction (gamma > 1 compresses bright regions) 3. Then applies CLAHE
You can adjust: - max_percentile
: Lower values will cap more bright pixels (try 95-99) - gamma
: Higher values compress bright regions more (try 1.0-1.5)
Try this and let me know if it better balances the bright and dim bacteria. We can further tune the parameters based on your results.
AI Prompt
Why is it converting the image to unit8?
AI Response
The conversion to uint8 (8-bit unsigned integer) is done because:
- OpenCV’s CLAHE implementation expects 8-bit images (values from 0-255)
- uint8 is the standard format for most image processing operations
However, if you’re working with microscopy data, you might have: - Higher bit depth images (12-bit, 16-bit) - Float values - Greater dynamic range
If this is the case, we can modify the code to preserve more of the original dynamic range. Here’s a version that handles higher bit depths:
def enhance_bacteria_highbit(image, clip_limit=10.0, tile_grid_size=(8,8), gamma=1.2, max_percentile=99):
# Store original dtype and range
= image.dtype
original_dtype = np.max(image)
original_max
# Work with float values for better precision
= image.astype(np.float32)
image_float
# Cap very bright intensities using percentile
= np.percentile(image_float, max_percentile)
threshold = np.minimum(image_float, threshold)
image_float
# Normalize to [0,1] range for gamma correction
= (image_float - np.min(image_float)) / (np.max(image_float) - np.min(image_float))
image_float
# Apply gamma correction
= np.power(image_float, gamma)
image_float
# Convert to uint8 only for CLAHE operation
= (image_float * 255).astype(np.uint8)
image_uint8
# Apply CLAHE
= cv2.createCLAHE(clipLimit=clip_limit, tileGridSize=tile_grid_size)
clahe = clahe.apply(image_uint8)
enhanced_uint8
# Convert back to original range and dtype
= enhanced_uint8.astype(np.float32) / 255.0
enhanced_float = (enhanced_float * original_max).astype(original_dtype)
enhanced
return enhanced
This version: 1. Preserves the original data type and range 2. Performs calculations in floating point for better precision 3. Only converts to uint8 temporarily for CLAHE 4. Returns the result in the original format
Would this be more suitable for your microscopy data?
AI Prompt
I have 16 bit data
AI Response
Ah yes, 16-bit microscopy data is common and has a range of 0-65535 (2^16 - 1), giving much better dynamic range than 8-bit. Here’s a version specifically optimized for 16-bit data:
def enhance_bacteria_16bit(image, clip_limit=10.0, tile_grid_size=(8,8), gamma=1.2, max_percentile=99):
assert image.dtype == np.uint16, "Input image should be 16-bit (uint16)"
# Work with float values for better precision
= image.astype(np.float32)
image_float
# Cap very bright intensities using percentile
= np.percentile(image_float, max_percentile)
threshold = np.minimum(image_float, threshold)
image_float
# Normalize to [0,1] range for gamma correction
= (image_float - np.min(image_float)) / (np.max(image_float) - np.min(image_float))
image_float
# Apply gamma correction
= np.power(image_float, gamma)
image_float
# Convert to uint8 only for CLAHE operation
= (image_float * 255).astype(np.uint8)
image_uint8
# Apply CLAHE
= cv2.createCLAHE(clipLimit=clip_limit, tileGridSize=tile_grid_size)
clahe = clahe.apply(image_uint8)
enhanced_uint8
# Convert back to 16-bit range
= (enhanced_uint8.astype(np.float32) / 255.0 * 65535).astype(np.uint16)
enhanced
return enhanced
Key changes in this version: 1. Added assertion to ensure 16-bit input 2. Uses full 16-bit range (0-65535) for the output 3. Maintains precision during processing steps
Try this with your 16-bit images. Let me know if you’d like to adjust any parameters or if you notice any loss of detail in important intensity ranges.
Using pytorch pt
format
Loading model and finetuning models
AI Prompt
This is great. I should be able to train better my model with those enhancements. I was going to use ultralytics, but I think it is better to just build my own library to train. Is it something I can do?
I want to use yolo’s official model, such as yolo11n-obb.pt
and finetune this for my own use.
AI Response
Yes, you can definitely build your own training pipeline for OBB-YOLO! Since you want to use the official YOLO model as a starting point, here’s a suggested approach:
- Framework Options:
- PyTorch (recommended since official YOLO models are in PyTorch)
- You can use YOLO’s architecture but build a simpler training pipeline
- Basic Steps:
import torch
from torch import nn
import torch.optim as optim
# 1. Load pretrained model
def load_pretrained_yolo(weights_path='yolov8n-obb.pt'):
= torch.load(weights_path)
model return model
# 2. Modify last layer for your needs
def modify_head(model, num_classes):
# Modify the detection head for your number of classes
# Exact modification depends on YOLO version and OBB implementation
pass
# 3. Basic training loop
def train(model, train_loader, val_loader, epochs=100):
= optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=0.001)
optimizer = optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, epochs)
scheduler
for epoch in range(epochs):
model.train()for batch in train_loader:
= batch
images, targets
optimizer.zero_grad()= model(images)
outputs = compute_loss(outputs, targets) # You'll need to implement this
loss
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
scheduler.step()
Would you like me to help you build this step by step? We can: 1. First set up the data loading pipeline 2. Then implement the model modification 3. Finally build the training loop
Which part would you like to tackle first?
Remember, key advantages of building your own pipeline: - Full control over the training process - Better understanding of what’s happening - Ability to customize for your specific needs (like your preprocessing) - Can be simpler than full YOLO implementations if you need only specific features